Tag Archive - culture

So Jennifer Knapp is a lesbian…


Tonight I asked on my Facebook page“So, Jennifer Knapp came out. How long until the church crucifies her?”

Here’s the article that I read: Christian Singer Jennifer Knapp Comes Out

I was then asked “So, what is the appropriate response?”
That’s a great question!

Here’s my attempt at a reply:

I don’t have all the answers for sure! Off the cuff, I’ll tell you some things that would be inappropriate responses…

  • Wiping her off of Christian radio playlists tomorrow
  • Anything knee-jerk
  • Pretending we are sinless

 We see bands like U2 and Creed that make no claims of faith, and we raise their songs as anthems in our churches. Why are they elevated, yet Jennifer will lose many contracts tomorrow?

We tolerate pompous, prideful Christian singers, but Michael English had to go. Did his songs lose their impact overnight?

Is a gay Christian worse than a Christian who is a glutton? How do we tolerate the “prosperity preachers” who are addicted to money, but a singer with a different issue is excommunicated?

Does her entertainer status make her a fair target and nullify the plank/speck rule?

Is Jennifer’s now-public admission worse than the private struggles that other musicians and preachers would lose their families over if they were known?

I think we need to first start by being honest with our perspective. I don’t know how to respond to it directly. I know a lot of ways to alienate people from the church though. I’ll try not to do those while I’m thinking it over.

What do YOU think?

(EDIT)
FWIW, found an article in Christianity Today too.  CLICK ME

Living On Mission


Great video by Ed Stetzer from his blog.

His tweet that caught my eye:

“I am sick of knowledgeable religious people not living on mission and then criticizing those who are.”

The text from his blog:

“Back in February I spoke at the Verge Missional Community Conference on making disciples. My topic was the need for obedience-based discipleship that moves from knowing to doing. Verge was an amazing gathering I was happy to be a part of. The HD versions of the preaching should be available in a few weeks, but for now you can check out my session via youtube.”

And finally…  the videos:

A Different Kind of Hypocrite


It is trendy to call Christians hypocrites.  Sadly, it is true more often than we’d like.  However, what most people call hypocrisy I would call fallen-ness.  A Christian, by the very nature of the term, stands for certain things.  That same person violates the beliefs he holds every day!  Does that make him a hypocrite?  I don’t think so.

The word “hypocrite”, from the Greek word transliterated “Hupokrites”, means “actor”.  The word was only used by Jesus.  And, he is only recorded as using the phrase on 7 different occasions, some appearing in multiple gospels.  (If you are interested, they are Mt 6, 7, 15, 22, 23 – Mk 7 – Lk 6, 12, 13)

Four of the seven times, Jesus was speaking directly to “Pharisees and teachers of the law”.  This illustrates that Jesus was most concerned with people who claimed to be speaking on God’s behalf.  Today, that would mean not only church leaders, but also anyone who would claim to be speaking for God.  (This is a claim I don’t think I’d ever have the nerve to make!  I’ve heard lots of people do it though.)  I think the message here is to be very careful that when you speak God’s truth to someone, you make sure that you are clearly speaking peer-to-peer, and not as a person who feels they have the moral high ground.

Six of the seven times, Jesus was rebuking people for either judging others or trying to trap Jesus himself.  Again, the latter is not something I think I would have been courageous enough or stupid enough to do.  At least I hope not!  But notice this.  These are not people who say “I believe it is wrong to steal”, and then steal.  That is merely sinning.  (And before you think you’re off the hook, Jesus has way more to say about sinning than hypocrisy!)  But think of the common usage of the term “hypocrite”.  People throw this term around, but they do so in a way Jesus never did.  He was speaking of people who pointed out faults in others that they themselves had – in spades!  He was speaking of people who set up obstacles for others.  The lesson here would be to realize that we ourselves are sinners, and rather than sitting in judgment over others, should speak to others as people who have received and continue to need God’s grace, just like they do.


But to me, the first recorded instance of Jesus’ use of the term is the most interesting. It is found in Matthew 6.  In all other instances, Jesus called people hypocrites because in some way they were acting in a way that was in conflict with their professions of faith.  They had they talk, but not the walk.  Not so the first time Jesus used the term.

In Jesus time, the entertainment of choice was the theater.  Not the cineplex that we call “theater” today.  These were places where people could watch a play.  They were usually outdoors.  There was some sort of elevated stage, and seating for hundreds, or even thousands of people.  There were no cameras or projection screens  There were no microphones or speakers.  Actors on the stage of the Roman theater would speak very loudly.  When they expressed themselves, they exaggerated wildly.  When you are talking to a friend, you can see in their eyes whether they are happy or sad.  If they were hundreds of feet away from you, they might have to pull their hair and tear their clothes while falling to their knees to communicate sadness.  Similarly, rather than a chuckle that most of the audience could neither see nor hear, they might grasp their belly and convulse wildly to appear to be in a fit of laughter.  With this in mind, read Matthew 6:1-6, and 16-18.




“Be careful not to do your ‘acts of righteousness’ before men, to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.  So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.  And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

“When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you fast, put oil on your head and wash your face, so that it will not be obvious to men that you are fasting, but only to your Father, who is unseen; and your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.” 

If I am honest, I think this is the type of hypocrite we see most in the church.  See what they are doing?  They are exaggerating their speech and actions in order to be noticed.  The other uses of ‘hypocrite’ I outlined above spoke of people acting in a way that betrayed their professed beliefs.  Jesus doesn’t say that is happening here.  There is nothing to indicate that the people giving to the needy were doing anything that countered their faith.  Likewise with those who prayed and fasted.  It looks to me like Jesus is saying “even when you do things I have commanded you to do, it is possible that you can still screw it up!”

  • How about placing your cash in the offering plate with a flourish so that people can see the green?
  • How about praying at a restaurant just loud enough, or with your brow furrowed enough, so that people know you are God’s chosen?
  • How about hollering “thank you Jesus!” when you find a parking spot?  Is it because you are truly thankful, or is it possible you just want attention?
  • What about when you give a “prayer request” with just a few too many details, that let people know how good you are or how bad the person who needs prayer is?
  • Do any of your cute bumper stickers and refrigerator magnets have ulterior motives to them?
  • Does a “Christian t-shirt” really bring people to salvation, or is it to show that you are better?
I could go on and on.  I have seen all of these, and done more than I care to admit!  My point is not to condemn, but to raise the issue.  When people call us hypocrites because we sin, they are simply wrong.  We sin because we are human.  But if we alienate the world, or try to show each other just how holy we are, we put the hypocrite label on ourselves.

JUDGED

Ouch.  Lots of lessons in here.  Even if you haven’t experienced any of the exact situations in these examples, who can’t relate to the shame and judgment they felt?  And it was dished out by churches and Christians.  That’s just great.  Want a guideline for being the church?  Just do the opposite of this video.

Accepting people doesn’t mean condoning sin.  The world accepts and condones.  If they’re coming to your church, they already know you don’t approve of their behavior!  But will you accept them as readily as the world does?

Grace doesn’t mean ignorance of sin.  It means acceptance of people in spite of sin.  But if you have no grace, you have no love.  You might as well put “Sinners need not apply” on your church sign.

This is a great retelling of the story of the “Good Samaritan” in today’s culture.
Is your church too good for sinners?  Are you too good to help the wounded?

Why the Name?

Good question. Glad you asked!

I was challenged recently about the tone I sometimes (always?) take in my posts. “Isn’t it a bit sarcastic?” My answer – yes!

My intention in all conversation, whether in person or online, is to accept everyone. However, I don’t believe that requires that I accept their ideas. I respect other people, but I see no basis that I should respect their beliefs. I welcome dialog and conflict. I’m probably kind of twisted that way. But I believe that foolish belief systems deserve to be mocked. I think the church is accepting of too many things. There are countless teachers “tickling ears” (2 Timothy 4:3-4) today, but I can’t recall any times that they have been called out by name in churches I have attended. It seems that the church is afraid of taking them on. I believe not only is it ok, but it is the responsibility of the church to take a stand on such things. Not just a non-descript “stand for Christ”, but also a stand against bad theology, heresy, and abuse of power. I believe that is a large part of the role of a shepherd.

The bible uses many tools to communicate. Not only parables, metaphors, and colloquialisms, but also satire, hyperbole, and even sarcasm. Jesus used all of these widely. Plain-old fact presentation is boring. It’s ok, and sometimes necessary, to rile people up! After all, how do you expose hypocrisy politely? How can you rebuke casually?

The tone I sometimes write in is not intended to recklessly offend. It is intended to get people’s attention. Shining light into dark places is abrupt and shocking. It sometimes takes a few minutes for our eyes to adjust.

Elijah suggested that Baal was asleep, or maybe on the toilet. Yikes! Probably ticked some people off!

Jesus called people “lost sheep”, a “den of thieves”, and a “brood of vipers”. Not endearing terms.

He accused us of having beams in of our eyes, and suggested that we often swallow camels while straining out gnats.

He told us not to give holy things to dogs, and proposed that we gouge our eyes out if necessary.

He was not always a polite speaker.

Most of us don’t heed the civil and well-mannered speed limit signs. It usually takes lights in our mirror to shock us out of our bad habits. We feel defensive when the cop taps on our window not because he is expressing himself improperly, but because he has identified a problem with our belief system. I think it is time that the church have a shock to its system.

I don’t have the spiritual gifts of diplomacy or ecumenism. I like to make people uncomfortable. Comfortable people don’t ask questions. Comfortable people don’t engage. Comfortable people don’t reevaluate themselves. They also don’t study the bible – that is, unless it is to review the verses they have already highlighted. I know this because I am uncomfortable. I have had to continually reassess and restudy things that I thought were settled. At least, I thought they were, back when I was comfortable. I have a feeling I am not alone.

Jesus said he came not to bring peace, but to bring a sword. He said he would divide us from friends and family. Not because he enjoys strife, but because he requires holiness.

I believe there are things worth getting a little riled up about, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for me to sit on the sidelines and watch them go by.

Page 4 of 5«12345»