Did Jesus speak out of both sides of his mouth?

I read a great post by Tony Morgan today, titled “Is it hard, or is it easy?“. He has been struggling trying to reconcile two passages.

First, the passages:

(1)  “Then Jesus said to his disciples, ‘If any of you wants to be my follower, you must turn from your selfish ways, take up your cross, and follow me. If you try to hang on to your life, you will lose it. But if you give up your life for my sake, you will save it’” (Matthew 16:24-25, NLT).

(2)  “Then Jesus said, ‘Come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you. Let me teach you, because I am humble and gentle at heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy to bear, and the burden I give you is light’” (Matthew 11:28-30, NLT).

Tony has wrestled with these for good reason. In his words, “Does taking up my cross mean there’s sacrifice and pain involved? Or, when I take up his yoke, is the burden light?” Do these contradict each other? Is there a tension we should live in? Surely, there is benefit in thinking this over and wrestling with the meaning.

Tony goes on to say that he’s currently at a place where he holds both in tension. In other words, both are true, but they seem to oppose one another in a way. He would say it is important for us to recognize that we will experience pain (1st passage) but that we’ll also have peace and joy (2nd passage). I encourage you to read his post here.

I don’t disagree with his thoughts.  And I’ve enjoyed my own thinking and wrestling today.  I had a few initial thoughts though, and I’m curious what you think.  Here is what I came up with and posted as a reply:

Great thoughts Tony! I should be working, but you’ve made me think. I’m sure I’ll be chewing on this for while, but here are my initial thoughts:

The first (Mt 16) is speaking to the selfish. The second (Mt 11) is speaking to the weary. The first group need to be broken, the second need a break.

The first speaks of carrying a cross. This is really hard work! Crosses are not designed for ease of carrying – they are designed to destroy us. The second speaks of taking on a yoke. A yoke is a beam designed to connect two oxen together for hard work such as plowing. If we are “taking his yoke on”, who is on the other side? He is! The burden is easy because he is doing the heavy lifting!


I wonder if the cross in the first passage speaks of sacrificing our life and giving it to him, while the yoke in the second passage speaks of the process of us working on our life.


The literal cross in Roman times signified the end of life. The figurative cross signifies the end of our living for ourselves. (I wonder if the figurative yoke could equate to discipleship.)


Great topic! I’ll be watching for more developments.

So, what do you think?  Am I on the right track?  Wrong track?  Additional insights?

Related posts:

  1. Sixpence None the Richer
  2. The Battle is not Yours… or is it?
  3. Stop Thinking About Eternal Life
  4. What’s Your Temperature?
  5. Stop Trying to be Better
  • http://conthis.blogspot.com Joe Sewell

    Good thoughts, Scott! “The first need to be broken, the second need a break” is the perfect answer in so many ways. Sometimes we are willfully stubborn in life, while other times we are simply worn down, already broken, and need to be built back up again.

    An additional contrast to the cross & the yoke is the purpose. To anyone around in that day, the cross brought death and a sick form of “entertainment.” The yoke, on the other hand, turned death into life — seed into plant.

  • http://sarcasticxtian.com/ Scott Smith

    Thanks Joe!
    I like your observation too. Hadn’t thought of that. Good insight!

  • http://padreallenpsblog.blogspot.com/ Fr. Allen

    I think you are on the right track. Firstly, let’s say that the unity of God’s revelation is a mystery that is being unveiled to us. Secondly, to turn from self to Christ is a painful process. Thirdly, those who choose Christ recieve a promise to have the Helper with him/her. The oxen metaphor can also sho that if we don’t fight against the bit and driver, our lives are easy as we gor forward under the Master’s direction. The cross metaphor shows us pain is short lived when we can see the true freedom of being in Christ. Which is easier, conforming to the image someone has put upon you whereby you always have to plase that person, or conforming to Jesus who know your true self?

  • http://sarcasticxtian.com/ Scott Smith

    More good thoughts! Thanks!!

  • http://real-url.org/twitted.php?id=18542304273 Twitted by sarcasticxtian

    [...] This post was Twitted by sarcasticxtian [...]

  • http://www.andrewgrant.me Andrew Grant

    The two may not conflict. If we ‘sacrifice’ everything that is extraneous and strip it off, our yoke is indeed light. The writer of Hebrews probably says it far more eloquently than I do:

    “Surrounded then as we are by these serried ranks of witnesses, let us strip off everything that hinders us, as well as the sin which dogs our feet, and let us run the race that we have to run with patience, our eyes fixed on Jesus the source and the goal of our faith. For he himself endured a cross and thought nothing of its shame because of the joy he knew would follow his suffering; and he is now seated at the right hand of God’s throne. Think constantly of him enduring all that sinful men could say against him and you will not lose your purpose or your courage.” Hebrews 12:1-3

    Even death is a blessed release from the travails of living the Kingdom life in this present evil age.

  • http://sarcasticxtian.com/ Scott Smith

    Good stuff Andrew – thanks!